Sortino proposed an improvement on the Sharpe Ratio to better account for skill and excess performance by using only downside semivariance as the measure of risk.

SortinoRatio(R, MAR = 0, ..., weights = NULL)

Arguments

R

an xts, vector, matrix, data frame, timeSeries or zoo object of asset returns

MAR

Minimum Acceptable Return, in the same periodicity as your returns

any other passthru parameters

weights

portfolio weighting vector, default NULL

Details

Sortino contends that risk should be measured in terms of not meeting the investment goal. This gives rise to the notion of “Minimum Acceptable Return” or MAR. All of Sortino's proposed measures include the MAR, and are more sensitive to downside or extreme risks than measures that use volatility(standard deviation of returns) as the measure of risk.

Choosing the MAR carefully is very important, especially when comparing disparate investment choices. If the MAR is too low, it will not adequately capture the risks that concern the investor, and if the MAR is too high, it will unfavorably portray what may otherwise be a sound investment. When comparing multiple investments, some papers recommend using the risk free rate as the MAR. Practitioners may wish to choose one MAR for consistency, several standardized MAR values for reporting a range of scenarios, or a MAR customized to the objective of the investor. $$ SortinoRatio=\frac{(\overline{R_{a} - MAR})}{\delta_{MAR}} $$ where \(\delta_{MAR}\) is the DownsideDeviation.

References

Sortino, F. and Price, L. Performance Measurement in a Downside Risk Framework. Journal of Investing. Fall 1994, 59-65.

See also

SharpeRatio DownsideDeviation SemiVariance SemiDeviation InformationRatio

Examples

data(managers) round(SortinoRatio(managers[, 1]),4)
#> HAM1 #> Sortino Ratio (MAR = 0%) 0.7649
round(SortinoRatio(managers[, 1:8]),4)
#> HAM1 HAM2 HAM3 HAM4 HAM5 HAM6 EDHEC LS EQ #> Sortino Ratio (MAR = 0%) 0.7649 1.222 0.7172 0.3234 0.1343 0.9102 0.9691 #> SP500 TR #> Sortino Ratio (MAR = 0%) 0.3064